[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: convergence problem




Hello Henning,

I took a look at your convergence problem. I think the problem is in the
definition of two copper polysulfide species. It should be -mass_balance
Cu(1)(S(-2)4)2 and Cu(1)S(-2)4S(-2)5. As it is currently defined, these
species are going into the Cu(2) mole balance, but adjusting the Cu+2
activity makes no difference in their concentration because Cu+ is in the
mass action equation. Changing the -mass_balance puts the species in the
Cu(1) mass balance. I'm not fond of polysulfide species anyway; they are
metastable, so there is a question of whether they should be used in a
model, and they tend to cause convergence problems.

Hope this helps.

Good to hear from you and take care,

David

David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx)
U.S. Geological Survey
Box 25046, MS 413
Denver Federal Center
Denver, CO 80225




Project Home Page
Complete Water Resources Division Software
USGS Home Page
Water Resources Division Home Page
NRP Home Page
Help Page
USGS Privacy Statement        Disclaimer

Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 


The URL of this page is: http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00347.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 1041 since Jan 22, 1998.