[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

*To*: "David L Parkhurst" <dlpark@xxxxxxxx>*Subject*: RE: SOlution Fractions*From*: "Ranjan S. Muttiah" <muttiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>*Date*: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:54:56 -0500*Importance*: Normal*In-reply-to*: <OF1068876C.F6DFD580-ON87256BF2.00536870@cr.usgs.gov>*In-reply-to*: <NFBBJFDDBBBCHIDBODCJEEJCCMAA.muttiah@brc.tamus.edu>*Reply-to*: <muttiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

>I'm not sure about your setup. If streams A and B mix to >form stream C, >then yes, the mixing fractions of A and B should be >approximately the relative flows of A and B. The measurements are on A (Sumner,NM) and downstream of A at B (Acme, NM) on the Pecos. I put in all the anion/cation measurements at A and B and get -200.2 for H2O mole transfer (see attached for input file). Looking at the stream flow record, there's 80 cfs at A and 15 cfs at B on the days of measurement. I'm assuming that the difference has been lost to evaporation and channel loss. The mixing ratio gives soln1:2 of 4.6:1 from the model. Should I take this to mean that the model estimates that 3.6 kg (= 200.2/55.5) of water was lost at B for every kg of water @ A due to evaporation ? (the recorded stream flow loss gives 80/15 = 5.7). How should I interpret the 4.6 ratio ?

**Attachment:
Pecos_SumnerAcmeSep1962.pqi**

**References**:**SOlution Fractions***From:*Ranjan S. Muttiah

- Prev by Date:
**Re: SOlution Fractions** - Next by Date:
**RE: SOlution Fractions** - Previous by thread:
**Re: -ve vs. +ve mole transfers & Closed vs. Open system** - Next by thread:
**RE: SOlution Fractions** - Index(es):

Project Home Page

Complete Water Resources Division Software

USGS Home Page

Water Resources Division Home Page

NRP Home Page

Help Page

Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

The URL of this page is:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00022.html

Email:dlpark@usgs.gov

Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $

Visitor number 1895 since Jan 22, 1998.