|
Thank you for fast answer!
Sorry, I didn't asked for charge balance with
sulfate but
if I input sulfat with or without charge,
that is
(measurement gave 400 mg/L)
S(6) 400.0 as SO4 charge
or
S(6) 400.0 as SO4
have I in every case to multiply the
phreeq-output
with 96000 to get the resulting SO4 in mg/L
so TOT("S(6)")*96000=SO4 in mg/L ?
Bernd
----- Original Message -----
From: "David L Parkhurst" <dlpark@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Bernd Ehret" <bernd.ehret@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 4:13
PM
In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: bernd > You asked for charge balance with sulfate, so the program adjusted the > sulfate concentration to achieve charge balance. Thus, there is more > sulfate than you calculate from the input data (~400/96). If you remove the > "charge" from the line, you should get what you expect, although there is a > small correction in going from mg/L to mol/kg water. > > David > > > David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx) > U.S. Geological Survey > Box 25046, MS 413 > Denver Federal Center > Denver, CO 80225 > > Project web page: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled > > > |
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00053.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] since Jan 22, 1998.