[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

discrepancies between sorbed and solvated Se in PHREEQC

Hi David,
The output from a sorption routine in PHREEQC shows that I have a certain number of moles of selenium species sorbed to Hfo_w.  However the solution composition shows the same number of moles present after sorption as was initially specified in the input solution.  Why is there no apparent decrease in disolved Se?  Does PHREEQC consider sorbed species to be in solution?
Also, I'm confused about the specification of sites and surface area in the surface data block.  After reading the FAQ's on the website I have the impression that the number of surface sites is either a number of moles of sites to which 1 kg of solution will be added (FAQ 60) or the number of moles of sites present on 1 mole of Fe (FAQ 61).  Which is correct?  If I specify the moles of a site present (and the mass of solid if sites are related to moles of solid) why is it necessary to specify surface area.
Thanks, Shane
Shane Matolyak
MAXIM Technologies, Inc.
PO Box 1413
Bozeman, MT 59771

Project Home Page
Complete Water Resources Division Software
USGS Home Page
Water Resources Division Home Page
NRP Home Page
Help Page
USGS Privacy Statement       

Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 

The URL of this page is: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00083.html
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 2663 since Jan 22, 1998.