Dear Dr. Parkhurst,
Having started to use the new version of PHREEQC (version 2) in an inverse
modelling mode, I tried running old models (run on version 1.03 PHREEQCi) to
check the feasible models were the same. Unfortunately I find that the
number of feasible models produced in version 2 is always less. For example,
the phase assemblage;
Muscovite dissolve
Microcline dissolve
Quartz dissolve
Biotite dissolve
Gypsum dissolve
Albite(low) dissolve
Gibbsite(C) precipitate
CO2(g)
SiO2(am) precipitate
Ferrihydrite precipitate
Illite precipitate
Calcite dissolve
Pyrite dissolve
O2(g)
in version 1 resulted in 35 models, 8 minimal, but in version 2, only 12
models, 12 minimum, were found. Consideration of the models indicated that
models NOT including pyrite oxidation (i.e. models where pyrite and oxygen
are used and where there are Fe(2) and S(-2) redox transfers) were only
found using version 1, and were not found using version 2. It is these
models that account for the extra feasable models in verson 1.
The input data was copied from the line editor of version 1 to version 2,
thus input solution and phase definition are exactly the same, uncertainties
were the same etc (full input data are pasted below). I tried to select and
de-select the mineral_water identifier to include or exclude water derived
from minerals in the water-balance equation as this seemed the only noteable
difference to the input data file. This made no difference.
Could you let me know why these differences occur?
Many thanks,
Andrew
Andrew Mitchell
Centre for Glaciology / Centre for Research into Environment and Health,
Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences,
University of Wales,
Aberystwyth.
Ceredigion. SY23 3DB
Tel: Direct (+44)(0)1970 622786
Main Office (+44)(0)1970 622606
Mobile 07949 406809
SOLUTION 1 supra1/8
temp 1
pH 6.67
pe 7
redox pe
units mg/kgs
S(6) 0.0048
Ca 0.34993
Mg 0.017703
Na 0.022
K 0.032287
Alkalinity 1.25
Al 2.838 ppb
Fe 49.8 ppb
SOLUTION 2 A177(10:00)
temp 1
pH 8.21
pe 7
redox pe
units mg/kgs
S(6) 5.716
Ca 6.726
Mg 0.364
Na 0.341
K 0.369
Alkalinity 16.35
Al 21.05 ppb
Fe 72.72 ppb
INVERSE_MODELING 1
-solutions 1 2
-uncertainty 0.1 0.1
-phases
Muscovite dissolve
Microcline dissolve
Quartz dissolve
Biotite dissolve
Gypsum dissolve
Albite(low) dissolve
Gibbsite(C) precipitate
CO2(g)
SiO2(am) precipitate
Ferrihydrite precipitate
Illite precipitate
Calcite dissolve
Pyrite dissolve
O2(g)
-balances
Alkalinity 0.3 0.1
-range 1000
-tolerance 1e-07
PHASES 1 # Do not change this number it is used by the program!
Biotite
KMg3AlSi3O10(OH)2 + 10H+ = K+ + 3Mg+2 + Al+3 + 3H4SiO4
logk 0
-check
Illite
K0.6Mg0.25Al2.3Si3.5O10(OH)2 + 11.2H2O = 0.6K+ + 0.25Mg+2 + 2.3Al(OH)4- +
3.5H4SiO4 + 1.2H+
logk 0
delta_h 0 kJ/mol
-check
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00264.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] since Jan 22, 1998.