Jeroen, > I would like to model the addition (by 'Mix') of acetate to lower the pe and to invoke sulphate reducing circumstances. MIX is used to mix solutions together and would be appropriate if you are adding an acetate-containing water to your system. Alternatively, if you are simply adding acetate to a solution, you might consider adding it through the REACTION data block. > The Acetate reactions from the minteq database do not change pe. That is correct, the way Acetate- is defined in both llnl.dat and minteq.dat, there is no connection with the inorganic carbon system. The original llnl data has acetate as a carbon species that would react to equilibrium with water and inorganic CO2, which is I think the way your are headed. > Therefore I took a reaction given by Lindsay: #taken from Lindsay, W.L., 'chemical equilibria in soils' 1979, p376 2 H2O + CH3COO- = 2 CO2 + 8 e- + 7 H+ log_k -9.64 delta_h 0 kcal CH3COO- = 2 CO2 + 4 e- + 3 H+ log_k -16.66 delta_h 0 kcal > This to involve pe in the reactions. Right, you need acetate to affect the inorganic carbon/water system. > Also is replaced all 'Acetate-' from minteq.dat by 'CH3COO-'. I am getting the following messages: ERROR: Coefficient of first species on rhs is not equal to 1.0. ERROR: Equation for species CO2 does not balance. ERROR: Could not reduce equation to secondary master species, CO2. ERROR: Calculations terminating due to input errors. Stopping. No memory leaks > maybe you can help me, I have attached the input-file to this message, The second equation does not balance with respect to oxygen. Both reactions define the acetate species, and you only need one definition. The reactions should be "association" reactions, meaning the species defined should be the first on the right hand side (and its coefficient should be 1.0; error message referred to the 2 for CO2 as the first species on the right hand side in your definition). The following reaction should work. 2 CO2 + 8 e- + 7 H+ = CH3COO- + 2 H2O log_k 9.64 However, thermodynamics (the log K of the reaction) will cause the equilibrium concentration of CH3COO- to be very small. In other words, there will not be any way to generate appreciable CH3COO- in any solution that you define. So, you can model the pe effect without adding CH3COO- as an aqueous species, simply by adding NaCH3COO in a REACTION data block. The carbon will end up as CO2 and CH4 in solution and the pe will be quite low. SOLUTION REACTION NaCH3COO 1.0 1 mole END Results should be almost identical to the following: SOLUTION_SPECIES 2 CO2 + 8 e- + 7 H+ = CH3COO- + 2 H2O log_k 9.64 SOLUTION REACTION NaCH3COO 1.0 1 mole END A more complicated approach is to keep Acetate as a SOLUTION_MASTER_SPECIES and use a KINETICS definition to transform Acetate into CH3COO; the CH3COO will react as shown in the examples above. This probably is closer to reality, where acetate will remain in solution, but be consumed at some rate by biological activity or perhaps by inorganic processes. David David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx) U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, MS 413 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Project web page: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 4428 since Jan 22, 1998.