Dear Sir/Madam, I would be very grateful if you could assist me in this query. I am using Phreeqc to calculate calcite saturation indices for my PhD. However, my manual calculations are coming out different to the Phreeqc results. As a test I used data from a hydrogeology textbook (Fetter(2001) applied hydrogeology, p360-1) which calculates calcite saturation manually. The textbook gives a saturation index of 0.05 while Phreeqc gives a saturation index of -0.02. Can you tell me if this difference is significant and if so where I might be going wrong? I would welcome any suggestions. Best regards, Garrett Kilroy PhD Candidate Department of Geology/ Centre for the Environment Trinity College Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1 608 2403 Fax: +353 1 671 8047
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number [Error Creating Counter File -- Click for more info] since Jan 22, 1998.