[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bernd
thank you
!!
answer with file tomorrow
Bernd
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 3:45
PM
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re: bernd
>
> Very large mixing fractions (100000) will probably cause
numerical
> problems; fractions < 10 or even 100 should be ok provided
the solutions
> start with about 1 kg water.
>
>
>
> Which fractions I have to use if some Deka or even millions of
cubic
> meter of
> water are to be mixed ?
>
> You will
have to use representative volumes, summing to 1 is preferable.
>
> > With the results from the MIX steps mentioned above I
couldn't estimate
> which kind
> of fractions give the right
answer.
>
> For pure mixing, results should be the same with the
same proportions. I
> would have to see a complete input file, hopefully
not too complicated, to
> tell you what is going on.
>
>
David
>
> David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx)
> U.S.
Geological Survey
> Box 25046, MS 413
> Denver Federal
Center
> Denver, CO 80225
>
> Project web page: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled
>
>
>
>
>
"Bernd
Ehret"
>
<bernd.ehret@xx-
To: "David L Parkhurst" <dlpark@xxxxxxxx>
>
Cottbus.De>
cc:
>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: Re:
bernd
>
09/04/02
04:51
>
AM
>
>
>
>
>
> From many tests with MIX I got different
results for the same mixing
> fractions
> of the input solutions,
for example:
>
> MIX 1
> # 0 0.1
> # 1 0.15
> # 2
0.25
> # 3 0.5 -> norm 1
>
> # 0
100000
> # 1 150000
> # 2 250000
> # 3 500000 -> no
convergence
>
> 0 7.2
> 1 10.8
> 2 18.0
> 3
36.0 -> no convergence
>
> # 0
0.072
> # 1 0.108
> # 2 0.180
> # 3 0.360 -> different
results as with first fractions
> SAVE solution 1001
> END
>
> MIX 2
> # 0 0.1
> # 1 0.2
> # 2 0.3
> # 1001
0.4
>
> # 0 100000
> # 1 200000
> # 2 300000
> #
1001 400000
>
> 0 7.2
> 1 14.4
> 2 21.6
> 1001
28.8
>
> # 0 0.072
> # 1 0.144
> # 2 0.216
> #
1001 0.288
> SAVE solution 1002
> END
>
> MIX 3
>
# 0 0.1
> # 1 0.25
> # 2 0.35
> # 1002 0.3
>
> #
0 100000
> # 1 250000
> # 2 350000
> # 1002 300000
>
> 0 7.2
> 1 18.0
> 2 25.2
> 1002 21.6
>
>
# 0 0.072
> # 1 0.180
> # 2 0.252
> # 1002 0.216
> SAVE
solution 1003
> END
>
> My conclusions are:
> -the
mixing fractions may not be to large, that is not >> 1
> -norm to
1.0 gives other results than without norm
>
> The question
is:
> Which fractions I have to use if some Deka or even millions of cubic
meter
> of
> water are to be mixed ?
> With the results from
the MIX steps mentioned above I couldn't estimate
> which
kind
> of fractions give the right answer.
>
> Bernd
>
>
>
>
>
Project Home Page
Complete Water Resources Division Software
USGS Home Page
Water Resources Division Home Page
NRP Home Page
Help Page
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and
presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This
information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be
correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole
responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this
publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by
the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00057.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] since Jan 22, 1998.