[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: phreeqc-alkalinity



Dear David,

I agree completely with you, including ANC and BNC definition. Furthermore in real systems dynamics
and kinetics are very important to reach the so called reference point. However, why Fe(3) hasn´t
got -3 as alkalinity in the phreeqc.dat?

René


David L Parkhurst wrote:
> 
> > I have a a problem with phreeqc calculation of alkalinity in strongly
> acidified mine pit lake water. The main constituents in well oxygenated
> surface water are Fe(3)-1.55mM, Al-1.24 mM and S(6)-13mM. The pH is given
> with 2.7. Phreeqc is calculating an alkalinity of -5.88e-03 eq/L. In my
> opinion this cannot be correct. Because of the infinite low CO2
> concentration the alkalinity (alk) is defined via
> 
> alk=-[H+]-aci[Fe-species]-aci[Al-species]-[HSO4-],
> 
> > isn´t it? I´m calculating -8.21e-03 eq/L.
> 
> > What about your ideas to solve this problem?
> 
> PHREEQC does just as you indicate, except that each aqueous species is
> assigned an alkalinity. Not all Fe+3 species have the same alkalinity, nor
> do all the Al+3 species. PHREEQC assigns an alkalinity to each of the
> master species (SOLUTION_MASTER_SPECIES data block). Alkalinities for the
> aqueous species are derived from the alkalinities assigned to the master
> species by using an equation that does not contain e- (probably can not
> have O2 or H2 either). For example:
> 
> Fe+3 is a master species assigned an alkalinity of -2 in phreeqc.dat; H+ is
> -1; H2O 0. Using the eqn Fe+3 + H2O = FeOH+2 + H+, FeOH+2 has an alkalinity
> of -1. After you have the alkalinity assigned to each aqueous species, sum
> the alkalinity times the molality of each species to get the alkalinity
> that PHREEQC calculates.
> 
> There is some ambiguity because of the pK of each hydrolysis species and
> the assignment of integral alkalinities to the master species; a species
> may not be completely titrated in an acidity titration. You may want to
> simulate a titration and look at the difference in the calculated
> alkalinities, which might give a more accurate value. In any event, there
> is some ambiguity in the definition of alkalinity, because it refers to an
> acid neutralizing capacity relative to a reference state (see Stumm and
> Morgan).
> 
> David
> 
> David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx)
> U.S. Geological Survey
> Box 25046, MS 413
> Denver Federal Center
> Denver, CO 80225
> 
> Project web page: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled

--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Otto-von-Guericke-University
Chair for Process System Engineering
Max-Planck-Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems
Physical and Chemical Process System Engineering
Dr. René Frömmichen

c/o
Institute for Chemistry
Universitätsplatz 2
39106 Magdeburg
Germany

tel +49 (0)391 67 12594
fax +49 (0)391 67 12223
e-mail rene.froemmichen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
       froemmic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--------------------------------------------------------------


Project Home Page
Complete Water Resources Division Software
USGS Home Page
Water Resources Division Home Page
NRP Home Page
Help Page
USGS Privacy Statement       

Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 


The URL of this page is: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00450.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 1943 since Jan 22, 1998.