Dr. Parkhurst: I have been working recently to add a triprotic representation of organic acids to the phreeqc.dat database. Because I will be applying this representation to very dilute waters, where the calculation of Acid Neutralization Capacity (ANC) is important, I wanted to make sure that I understand how to specify the "alk" value that is assigned to a SOLUTON_MASTERS_SPECIES. ANC is usually determined by Gran titration to an endpoint pH of 4.8 to 5.2. Thus, it represents the difference between the sum of H+ acceptors minus the sum of the H+ donors by laboratory titration. Hence, I was thinking that the aqueous species that are present at that pH range of 4.8 to 5.2 represent the "zero-point" for the contribution of that particular species to the ANC. Given that small bit of background, I notice that in phreeqc.dat, that the "alk" value for Fe+3 is -2.0, i.e., #element species alk gfw_formula element_gfw Fe(+3) Fe+3 -2.0 Fe I guess that I was thinking that alk should be equal to +2.0 based on reactions like the following that would accept H+ in a titration: Fe(OH)3 + H+ = Fe(OH)2+ + H20 Fe(OH)2+ + H+ = FeOH+2 + H2O where FeOH+2 would be the dominant species at the titration endpoint at pH 4.8 to 5.2. In the same way, I was also think that Al would need to have a similar entry in the SOLUTION_MASTER_SPECIES list, e.g., #element species alk gfw_formula element_gfw Al Al+3 +2.0 Al 26.9815 Likewise, for the triprotic organic acid that I want to define, the predominant aqueous species at pH 4.8 to 5.2 is HOrgacid-2, hence I think that I need to define Orgacid in the SOLUTION_MASTER_SPECIES as: #element species alk gfw_formula element_gfw Orgacid Orgacid-3 2.0 Orgacid 218.2 in consideration of reactions like the following that involve H+ acceptors: Orgacid-3 + H+ = HOrgacid-2 and HOrgacid-2 + H+ = H2Orgacid- I have the feeling that my logic about all this may be flawed given that I am not certain why Fe+3 has a an alk value of -2.0 rather than +2.0. I suspect that the problem is that I am thinking in terms of ANC and not alkalinity as used by PHREEQC, but wondered if you might be able to clarify if possible. Also, I think there is an alternative approach that I can take, which would be to not worry about the "alk" values for various master solution species and calculate the ANC from the PHREEQC speciation results by something like: ANC = [HCO3-] + 2[CO3-2] + 2[Orgacid-3] + [HOrgacid-2] + [Al(OH)2+] + 3[Al(OH)4-] + 2[Fe(OH)3] + Fe(OH)2+] + [OH-] - [H+] Thank you for the time and consideration of my question, Ted Eary __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 3864 since Jan 22, 1998.