Hi Craig, > Regarding the below inquiry to the GWB users' group, can you clue me in on the relationship between the Nordstrom et al (1990) compilation and the PhreeqC and Water4F databases? Both phreeqc.dat and wateq4f.dat should be compatible with Nordstrom et al. Phreeqc.dat is essentially a subset of wateq4f.dat, but there are a few differences in mineral names and a perhaps a very few reactions. The Nordstrom compilation is limited, so there are many reactions in both databases that are not contained in the Nordstrom compilation. > BTW, we are in the process of converting the latter databases, as well as the MINTEQ database, into the GWB format. This should make our codes largely cross-compatible, since as I remember you have ported the LLNL database to PhreeqC format. Sounds good. David David Parkhurst (dlpark@xxxxxxxx) U.S. Geological Survey Box 25046, MS 413 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 Project web page: https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number 1928 since Jan 22, 1998.