|
Dear Dr. Parkurst:
I apologize for bothering you with another
question. This time it is about logistics of ADVECTION.
I have simulated the solution chemistry and uranium
sorption after one and two pore volumes of SOLUTION 0 moved through the
soil column as described in my earlier E-mail.
The results for uranium sorbed within each layer
after one and two pore volumes are identical. It seems to me that the
logistics of ADVECTION key word does not account for the reduced site
concentration that exist after the first pore volume moved through. Am I
interpreting it correctly, and if so, is there any way to account for the
reduction in site concentration for the advancement of the second pore
volume?
Thanks again,
Marek
Marek Zaluski, Ph.D.
Phone: 406.494.7434 Fax: 406.494.7230 e-mail: zaluskim@xxxxxxxxxx MSE Technology Applications 200 Technology Way P.O. Box 4078 Butte MT 59702 USA |
Please note that some U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) information accessed through this page may be preliminary in nature and presented prior to final review and approval by the Director of the USGS. This information is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete and conclusions drawn from such information are the sole responsibility of the user.
Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
The URL of this page is:
https://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/projects/GWC_coupled/phreeqc/mail/msg00538.html
Email:dlpark@usgs.gov
Last modified: $Date: 2005-09-13 21:04:21 -0600 (Tue, 13 Sep 2005) $
Visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] since Jan 22, 1998.